In my last post, I proposed a nice organisational direction leading through
various stages until true multichannel is reached. Unfortunately this usually
falls at the first hurdle: new organisational disciplines which didn’t exist
prior to multichannel, and – here’s the rub – don’t obviously fit anywhere in
an existing retail organisation and/or nobody “wants” them.
Many new disciplines – SEO for example, or email marketing –
tend to drop nicely into place. In the early days of “Multiple Channel”
retailing, with a Rebellion or Distributed organisational model (see my previous post) SEO activity
will sit in an eCommerce team itself. Later on as the organisation matures, it
will move naturally into Marketing.
Others, such as managing a Fulfilment Centre specialising in
single-pick customer orders (as distinct from bulk retail replenishment) tend
to land naturally in their primary discipline from day 1, in this case Logistics.
The “bastard discipline from hell”, as everybody who has
ever been involved in a new eCommerce implementation knows all too well, is
Product Data Management. It is always on the project critical path. And nobody
ever wants to own it, either during implementation or afterwards in
business-as-usual. It’s one of those tasks you can never do well, only do with
varying degrees of less-badness, so there’s no reward. It’s horribly labour
intensive, so there’s lots of cost. And it’s completely new, a discipline that
simply wasn’t required before online channels came along.
Where should it sit in the organisation? It could sit in “eCommerce”. This, to me, is one of the tests I use early in an engagement to understand how multichannel a client is. If they still have Product Data Management in some sort of eCommerce leper’s camp, safely isolated from the rest of the organisation, then I can be pretty sure a client is organisationally pretty immature.
It’s often forced into Commercial or Buying teams. The argument
is that these are the people with the relationship with suppliers, so these are
the people that can source the data. While this is true in a way, I’m not sure
I’ve ever worked with a Buying team whose primary competence is Business
Process/Administration. On the other hand, at least these teams have a strong
focus on sales (usually! – and yes I have worked with at least one retailer
where Buying didn’t appear to have a sales target…). And lousy product data
online usually equates to lousy sales.
My favourite example of lousy product data ensuring lousy
sales, from some years ago now so I think I can use it without causing blushes,
is this product sold by a major DIY retailer:
“What size are these doors?” is fairly fundamental. Worse still, the question had actually been answered on the forum, with a precise and accurate answer… by one of the retailer's buyers for the Doors category.
So, if Product Data Management doesn’t belong in eCommerce,
or in Category Management, where else? Well, some sort of dedicated admin team
is possible. But where should it report to? It’s unlikely to be big enough to
merit a top-table seat in its own right, so it’s still left looking for a home.
Take a closer look at it. What does it involve? Well, it’s
very business process driven, standards and compliance are essential, flow
management is important, just-in-time-delivery is a core competence, it’s about
getting something from suppliers, and you are always working to serve demanding
sales channels… sounds very like logistics / supply chain doesn’t it? The
difference is that instead of a physical supply chain via warehouses, there’s a
virtual supply chain via data warehouses.
I do indeed know of organisations that do this (I say this
hastily before I get hostile comments posted by irate Logistics Directors).
But it’s also perhaps the strongest illustration of another
key consequence of become Multichannel: very
new disciplines in traditional functions. Logistics is the New Marketing
has been one of my themes in these posts. Here’s a related one: Product Data is the New Logistics.
Thanks Chris. That is some really great in sight on product data management.
ReplyDeleteFrom an ecommerce perspective, i've usually seen a team of product content folks who are responsible for the cleaning up of data received from suppliers and make it customer friendly. They have a set of people working on a workflow model with managers being the final approvers of what goes in production.
On a different note, would you mind shedding some light on how you think different channels should share the credit of who gets the sale in a true multi channel world, where the sale could be initiated by any channel.
Thanks
Amit
Thanks Amit.
Delete"Sharing the credit" post coming up soon.
P.S. you could buy my book: the topic is covered in there!