As promised in my last post, I’m going to take a look at a few of the many other
impacts that going multichannel has on a retail organisation.
A high level overview seems like a good place to start. I
typically see the following models, either in action, or – unfortunately – more
often in aspiration, when I work with clients:
I’d like to say that the Rebellion model – where a small
number of people, typically from I.T. and Marketing conspire together to drag a
retailer online – is already dead. In actual practice, a version which I’ll
call Sponsored Revolution seems to be alive and well. In its typical
manifestation, there is indeed a general top-management mandate for adding new
channels, but this does not translate into altering individual targets and
KPIs, and so the implementation project team or eCommerce team has to spend a
disproportionate percentage of its effort wheedling co-operation out of the
rest of the organisation. To give a specific example, it is very difficult to
persuade an individual buyer to devote 20% of his/her time to developing the
range for online, or (worse) helping with product data management, when it is
expected that only 3% of sales, and therefore 3% of his/her existing targets,
will be met from online sales in the next 12 months.
The Distributed model is the one I encounter most often in
actual practice (although this might be a biased reflection of the developmental
stage of organisations that typically engage me). A small dedicated team looks
after driving the new channel(s), but has a clearly defined mandate to use
certain resources from existing business teams. To use the same example, the
buyer would have a specific target for new channel sales, and a clearly stated
guideline regarding the expected time commitment.
In practice, retailers make these transitions at different
speeds in different areas of the business. It’s not uncommon to see something
like Multichannel buying, Focussed marketing, and Distributed logistics. It’s
important that this is a deliberate choice, not an organisational accident or
worse still a kind of Darwinian struggle for channel supremacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment